Proactivity versus reactivity is an ongoing battle in the workplace. The differences between the two cultures lie in the unique processes and approaches to work.
A reactive culture is based on making changes in the company when it is considered absolutely necessary, often resulting in jumping on the bandwagon too late. This disadvantages businesses as they are unprepared for future situations, requiring modern approaches to corporate processes. Reactive organizations often implement changes depending on the presence of extenuating circumstances. This means that they may wait until detrimental situations occur to make changes, for instance, waiting for an economic crisis before constructing a more effective budget. The impact of reactive company cultures puts organizations at risk as they typically ignore danger signs and produce more stressful workplaces.
On the other hand, a proactive business culture refers to companies with a significant comparative advantage against competitors. This is exemplified in the development of corporate flexibility, productivity and efficiency in the workplace. Proactive cultures positively affect companies, giving rise to a plethora of benefits. These include:
1. Proactive organizations are prepared for change. The organizations asses the business environment, scanning for trends and changes for the improvement of performance and contribution to success.
2. Data is used to optimize organizational performance. Evaluating company performance is essential for progress and assessment of its productivity and efficiency. Accurate data is the most valuable and reliable measures of corporate success, utilised by the most proactive organizations.
3. Proactive organizations are not left behind the times. These companies are always at the top of their game, ensuring they dictate their actions based on future forecasting, not because they are forced to make changes.
4. Continual self-improvement is enabled. When organizations keep themselves up-to-date on the most modern approaches to learning and corporate success, they are continually building on existing assets, making for a more holistic company culture. Reactive organizations lack in self-improvement, often focusing on just keeping their head above water.
5. They are also cost-effective. When organizations perform at maximum productivity and efficiency, major problems are less likely to arise without being solved immediately. Preventing the transition of minor problems into major ones saves money in the long-run.
If you would like to learn more about how to build the most effective employee training strategy!
If you’d like to know more about how EdApp’s mobile learning platform can help your internal training practices, get in touch at email@example.com. You can also try EdApp’s Mobile LMS and authoring tool for free by signing up here.
Small Business Chron
You might also be interested in this article: